Oracle中使用Rownum分页详细例子

这篇文章主要介绍了Oracle中使用Rownum分页详细例子,本文将分别展示使用rownum伪列和row_number()分析函数来完成Oracle数据分页操作的具体使用方法,需要的朋友可以参考下

在MySQL中，我们通常都使用limit来完成数据集获取的分页操作，而在Oracle数据库中，并没有类似limit一样的方便方法来实现分页，因此我们通常都是直接在SQL语句中完成分页，这里就需要借助于rownum伪列或row_number()函数了，本文将分别展示使用rownum伪列和row_number()分析函数来完成Oracle数据分页操作的具体使用方法，并分析和比较两者的性能优劣

一、初始化测试数据

首先测试数据我选取了数据字典all_objects表中的70000条数据，创建步骤如下

-- 为了方便验证结果集以及避免不必要的排序,这里我直接使用了rownum来产生了有序的OBJECT_ID列
SQL> create table my_objects as
2 select rownum as OBJECT_ID,OBJECT_NAME,OBJECT_TYPE
3 from all_objects where rownum < 70001;

Table created.

-- 对OJBECT_ID列建立主键
SQL> alter table my_objects add primary key (object_id);

Table altered.

SQL> select count(*) from my_objects;

COUNT(*)

70000

-- 分析该表
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'my_objects',cascade => TRUE);

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

二、分页数据获取

为了完成分页，我们需要获得该表中的第59991-60000条的10条记录，这个工作我们分别使用rownum和rown_number()来实现

-- 方法一，rownum伪列方式
SQL> select t. from (select d.,rownum num from my_objects d where rownum<=60000) t where t.num>=59991;

OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_TYPE NUM
---------- ------------------------------ ------------------- ----------
59991 /585bb929_DicomRepos24 JAVA CLASS 59991
59992 /13a1874f_DicomRepos25 JAVA CLASS 59992
59993 /2322ccf0_DicomRepos26 JAVA CLASS 59993
59994 /6c82abc6_DicomRepos27 JAVA CLASS 59994
59995 /34be1a57_DicomRepos28 JAVA CLASS 59995
59996 /b7ee0c7f_DicomRepos29 JAVA CLASS 59996
59997 /bb1d935c_DicomRepos30 JAVA CLASS 59997
59998 /deb95b4f_DicomRepos31 JAVA CLASS 59998
59999 /9b5f55c0_DicomRepos32 JAVA CLASS 59999
60000 /572f1657_DicomRepos33 JAVA CLASS 60000

10 rows selected.

-- 方法二，row_number分析函数方式
SQL> select * from
2 (select t.*,row_number() over (order by t.OBJECT_ID) as num
3 from my_objects t)
4 where num between 59991 and 60000;

OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_TYPE NUM
---------- ------------------------------ ------------------- ----------
59991 /585bb929_DicomRepos24 JAVA CLASS 59991
59992 /13a1874f_DicomRepos25 JAVA CLASS 59992
59993 /2322ccf0_DicomRepos26 JAVA CLASS 59993
59994 /6c82abc6_DicomRepos27 JAVA CLASS 59994
59995 /34be1a57_DicomRepos28 JAVA CLASS 59995
59996 /b7ee0c7f_DicomRepos29 JAVA CLASS 59996
59997 /bb1d935c_DicomRepos30 JAVA CLASS 59997
59998 /deb95b4f_DicomRepos31 JAVA CLASS 59998
59999 /9b5f55c0_DicomRepos32 JAVA CLASS 59999
60000 /572f1657_DicomRepos33 JAVA CLASS 60000

10 rows selected.

可以看到这两种方式都返回了正确的结果集；在rownum方法中，由于不可以直接使用rownum伪列执行”大于“比较运算，所以这里是先从子查询中使用rownum来获得前60000条数据，然后在外层查询中使用大于运算去除不需要的行。而对于row_number()方法，row_number()分析函数以OBJECT_ID排序并为其生成了唯一的标识，然后通过between这种便于理解的方式来获取区间数据，那么实际的执行是不是这样的呢？我们来简单分析一下两者的执行细节。

三、分页性能分析

首先还是看一下他们的执行计划

SQL> set autotrace traceonly
SQL> set linesize 200

-- rownum伪列分页的执行计划
SQL> select t. from (select d.,rownum num from my_objects d where rownum<=60000) t where t.num>=59991;

10 rows selected.

Execution Plan

Plan hash value: 341064162

---

| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |

| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 60000 | 3164K| 103 (0)| 00:00:02 |
|* 1 | VIEW | | 60000 | 3164K| 103 (0)| 00:00:02 |
|* 2 | COUNT STOPKEY | | | | | |

| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| MY_OBJECTS | 60000 | 2226K| 103 (0)| 00:00:02 |

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

1 - filter("T"."NUM">=59991)
2 - filter(ROWNUM<=60000)

Statistics

163 recursive calls
0 db block gets
399 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1030 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
419 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
5 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
10 rows processed

-- row_number()分页的执行计划
SQL> select * from
2 (select t.*,row_number() over (order by t.OBJECT_ID) as num
3 from my_objects t)
4 where num between 59991 and 60000;

10 rows selected.

Execution Plan

Plan hash value: 2942654422

---

| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |

| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 70000 | 3691K| 565 (1)| 00:00:07 |
|* 1 | VIEW | | 70000 | 3691K| 565 (1)| 00:00:07 |
|* 2 | WINDOW NOSORT STOPKEY | | 70000 | 2597K| 565 (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MY_OBJECTS | 70000 | 2597K| 565 (1)| 00:00:07 |

| 4 | INDEX FULL SCAN | SYS_C0011057 | 70000 | | 146 (0)| 00:00:02 |

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

1 - filter("NUM">=59991 AND "NUM"<=60000)
2 - filter(ROW_NUMBER() OVER ( ORDER BY "T"."OBJECT_ID")<=60000)

Statistics

1 recursive calls
0 db block gets
490 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1030 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
419 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
10 rows processed

从上面的执行计划中我们可以看出，rownum方法使用了全表扫描来获得表中的前60000行，然后使用谓词条件”T”.”NUM”>=59991来过滤掉了不需要的行；而row_number()方法虽然利用到了主键索引来省去了分析函数本身产生的window的排序操作，但它还是先获取了表中的所有70000行数据，然后再使用between关键字来过滤数据行，这个操作的很多资源都消耗在了数据读取上了，所以上面的例子中，rownum伪列方法获得了较好的性能，而实际上，在大多数情况下，第一种rownum方法都会获得较好的性能。

可能有人会疑问，既然row_number()方法在数据读取上面花费了这么多的资源，为什么不直接让它全表扫描呢，那么我们来看看使用全表扫描的情形：

-- 直接禁用主键
SQL> alter table my_objects disable primary key;

Table altered.

SQL> select * from
2 (select t.*,row_number() over (order by t.OBJECT_ID) as num
3 from my_objects t)
4 where num between 59991 and 60000;

10 rows selected.

Execution Plan

Plan hash value: 2855691782

---

| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |

| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 70000 | 3691K| | 812 (1)| 00:00:10 |
|* 1 | VIEW | | 70000 | 3691K| | 812 (1)| 00:00:10 |
|* 2 | WINDOW SORT PUSHED RANK| | 70000 | 2597K| 3304K| 812 (1)| 00:00:10 |

| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | MY_OBJECTS | 70000 | 2597K| | 120 (1)| 00:00:02 |

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

1 - filter("NUM">=59991 AND "NUM"<=60000)
2 - filter(ROW_NUMBER() OVER ( ORDER BY "T"."OBJECT_ID")<=60000)

Statistics

190 recursive calls
0 db block gets
450 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1030 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
419 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
6 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
10 rows processed

可以看到这种全表扫描的情形发生WINDOW SORT PUSHED RANK方法，也就是说这会cpu资源又花在了对object_id的排序上了，尽管在本例中object_id已经有序了，性能上同样不及rownum方式。

所以在写程序的过程中，对于Oracle的分页操作我还是倾向于使用如下的rownum的方式来完成，通常的写法如下：

-- 返回第20页数据，每页10行
SQL> define pagenum=20
SQL> define pagerecord=10
SQL> select t. from (select d.,rownum num from my_objects d
2 where rownum<=&pagerecord*&pagenum) t
3 where t.num>=(&pagenum-1)*&pagerecord +1;

old 2: where rownum<=&pagerecord*&pagenum) t
new 2: where rownum<=10*20) t
old 3: where t.num>=(&pagenum-1)*&pagerecord +1
new 3: where t.num>=(20-1)*10 +1

OBJECT_ID OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_TYPE NUM
---------- ------------------------------ ------------------- ----------
191 SQLOBJ$DATA_PKEY INDEX 191
192 SQLOBJ$AUXDATA TABLE 192
193 I_SQLOBJ$AUXDATA_PKEY INDEX 193
194 I_SQLOBJ$AUXDATA_TASK INDEX 194
195 OBJECT_USAGE TABLE 195
196 I_STATS_OBJ# INDEX 196
197 PROCEDURE$ TABLE 197
198 PROCEDUREINFO$ TABLE 198
199 ARGUMENT$ TABLE 199
200 SOURCE$ TABLE 200

10 rows selected.

备注：

在写程序的时候为了便于理解，也会有人在rownum方法中使用between来限定数据行，写法如下

select t. from (select rownum num, d. from my_objects d) t where t.num between 59991 and 60000;

在他们看来，这样写返回的数据行和第一种rownum方法是一致的，Oracle会推进谓词between部分到子查询内部，同样也不影响性能，而这种想法是完全错误的，我们来看一下它的具体执行计划：

SQL> select t. from (select rownum num, d. from my_objects d) t where t.num between 59991 and 60000;

10 rows selected.

Execution Plan

Plan hash value: 1665864874

---

| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |

| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 70000 | 3691K| 120 (1)| 00:00:02 |
|* 1 | VIEW | | 70000 | 3691K| 120 (1)| 00:00:02 |
| 2 | COUNT | | | | | |

| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| MY_OBJECTS | 70000 | 2597K| 120 (1)| 00:00:02 |

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):

1 - filter("T"."NUM"<=60000 AND "T"."NUM">=59991)

Statistics

0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
423 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
1030 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
419 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
10 rows processed

可以非常醒目的看到这个查询先发生了70000行的全表扫描，并非预想的60000行，原因还是rownum，在子查询中使用rownum直接禁用了查询转换阶段的谓语前推功能，所以上面的查询只能先获得所有的数据再应用between来过滤了。可以参考我的这篇【CBO-查询转换探究】。

说了这么多，其实也就是Oracle的分页的三条SQL语句，对于数据量非常大的分页问题，单纯这样做是不会获得高效的，因此还需要借助于一些其他技术，比如反范式化设计，预先计算或者在应用层建立适当的缓存机制。

Oracle row_number() over()解析函数高效实现分页

Oracle row_number() over()解析函数高效实现分页，需要的朋友可以参考下

create table T_NEWS
(
ID NUMBER,
N_TYPE VARCHAR2(20),
N_TITLE VARCHAR2(30),
N_COUNT NUMBER
)

prompt Disabling triggers for T_NEWS...
alter table T_NEWS disable all triggers;
prompt Loading T_NEWS...
insert into T_NEWS (ID, N_TYPE, N_TITLE, N_COUNT)
values (1, 'IT', '爱it1', 100);
insert into T_NEWS (ID, N_TYPE, N_TITLE, N_COUNT)
values (2, '体育', '爱体育1', 10);
insert into T_NEWS (ID, N_TYPE, N_TITLE, N_COUNT)
values (3, '体育', '爱体育2', 30);
insert into T_NEWS (ID, N_TYPE, N_TITLE, N_COUNT)
values (4, 'IT', '爱it2', 300);
insert into T_NEWS (ID, N_TYPE, N_TITLE, N_COUNT)
values (5, 'IT', '爱it3', 200);
insert into T_NEWS (ID, N_TYPE, N_TITLE, N_COUNT)
values (6, '体育', '爱体育3', 20);
insert into T_NEWS (ID, N_TYPE, N_TITLE, N_COUNT)
values (7, '体育', '爱体育4', 60);
commit;

第一步：我先用rownum

--分页 row_number，不是rownum
--根据n_count从大到小排列，每页3条
SELECT ROWNUM r,t.* FROM t_news t
WHERE ROWNUM<=3
ORDER BY t.n_count DESC
--问题：为什么order by以后，行号是乱的？
SELECT ROWNUM r,t.* FROM t_news t
--原因：先分配了行号，再根据n_count排序

--所以必须排序，再生成行号
SELECT ROWNUM r,t.* FROM (
SELECT t.* FROM t_news t ORDER BY t.n_count DESC ) t

--分页
--err
SELECT ROWNUM r,t.* FROM (
SELECT t.* FROM t_news t ORDER BY t.n_count DESC ) t
WHERE r between 1 AND 3

--第1页
SELECT ROWNUM r,t.* FROM (
SELECT t.* FROM t_news t ORDER BY t.n_count DESC ) t
WHERE ROWNUM between 1 AND 3

--第2页
SELECT ROWNUM r,t.* FROM (
SELECT t.* FROM t_news t ORDER BY t.n_count DESC ) t
WHERE ROWNUM between 4 AND 6
--error: ROWNUM必须从1开始！
SELECT k.* FROM (
SELECT ROWNUM r,t.* FROM (
SELECT t.* FROM t_news t ORDER BY t.n_count DESC ) t
) k
WHERE r BETWEEN 4 AND 6

--麻烦，效率低！

*第二步:我用row_number() over()函数
select t2.* from
(select t.*,row_number()over(order by t.n_count desc) orderNumber from t_news t order by t.n_count desc)t2 where orderNumber between 1and 3;

*88
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT t.*,row_number() over(ORDER BY n_count DESC) r
FROM t_news t
ORDER BY t.n_count DESC
) t
WHERE r BETWEEN 4 AND 6

--通用语法： 解析函数() over(partition by 字段 order by 字段)